Fair Policy, Fair Discussion

June 14, 2010

Rabbi Speaks on Human Rights and Zionism

Today, Rabbi Arik Ascherman of Rabbi’s for Human Rights gave a lecture at the Middle East Institute concerning the definition of  Zionism and its impact on human rights in Israel and the  Occupied Palestinian Territories. Rabbi Ascherman started off his presentation by explaining the fact that within Israel there is a question over the ideological identity of the state. For quite a while there has been a battle between more right-wing zionists and a more liberal non-zionist left.

Ascherman defined  Zionism as the idea that Judaism is not simply a religion, but that the Jews are a people themselves and that their homeland is in Israel. He also explained that this idea existed long before it was called Zionism, and that this can be seen by the fact that for thousands of years the Jewish Holidays and other aspects of the Jewish calendar have been based upon the agricultural calendar of Israel.

One of the major points made by Ascherman throughout his lecture, was that there are many different strands of Zionism. The two primary strands are political zionism and cultural zionism. Political zionsism is the idea that although the Jewish people have tried to assimilate to various different communities and have created their own  affluent sub-communities the prevalence of anti-semitism has caused assimilation to fail, and that the only true home for the Jewish people is in Israel.  Cultural Zionism is the idea that the Jewish people can thrive and be safe within Israel. But, a point that Ascherman strongly emphasizes is that for cultural zionists, a Jewish state is simply a means and not an end.

The lecture then turned to the question: Can zionism be compatible with human rights? When addressing this question Ascherman separated the idea of human rights into two categories; individual human rights and the human rights of Palestinians as a whole. He stated that when he spoke with more conservative zionists in Israel on the subject of individual human rights almost everyone was in agreement that people are entitled to these basic liberties. However, once the topic shifted to the human rights of Palestinians as a people he said, “there was no longer very much for us to talk about.”

The major issue of human rights in Israel derives from the idea that the existence of a Jewish State is an imperative. Ascherman noted that in Israel all but a handful of people consider themselves to be Zionists, and that almost all of them believe that the existence of a Jewish State is in fact an imperative. This explains why Israelis are so unwilling to give into the idea of “full right of return”, or that both the Jewish and Palestinian people have the right to return to their homeland in Israel. The real issue with a “full right of return” in Israel is that if there were a sudden influx of non Jews into Israel, then there would be the possibility that Jews would no longer constitute the majority. This would therefore put into jeopardy the Jewish State seen by many Israelis as a necessity.

If you would like more information on the event or about Rabbi Arik Ascherman it is available at the Middle East Institute Website:

http://www.mei.edu/Events/Calendar/tabid/504/vw/3/ItemID/268/d/20100610/Default.aspx

Advertisements

1 Comment »

  1. Israel was created with the help of a ghost army, an army of the innocent who died in the Holocaust. The dilemma is that in the creation of the state, another army of innocents was created – the displaced and killed Palestinians.

    The army of the Holocaust innocents is invoked each time the challenge is issued – “Do you believe in the right of Israel to exist!?” This is the show stopper, the unanswerable question. Watch this short debate involving former NYC mayor Ed Koch to see it in action. It is the last line of defense.

    The army of the Holocaust innocent is fixed in size and diminishes in influence with time, as does every memory in the human brain.

    But the army of the Palestinian innocent just gets bigger and bigger with the actions of Israel. Anyone considering the future of Israel should be doing everything possible to end the settlement movement, end evictions and create a Palestinian state. If this isn’t done, the future of Israel itself is in greater danger than it could be from any possible military threat.

    The proper and immediate response to anyone asked if they deny Israel’s right to exist is “Do you acknowledge the original and continuing Nakba?”

    Comment by Clif Brown — June 14, 2010 @ 12:41 pm | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: