Fair Policy, Fair Discussion

July 27, 2010

Perspectives on Reconciliation

Today, I attended a hearing on Capitol Hill hosted by the U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations that focused on viable strategies on Afghanistan. It was entitled: Perspectives on Reconcilation Options in Afghanistan.

Panelists included former Ambassador to Pakistan, Ryan Crocker, Zainab Salbi of Women for Women International, and Dr. David Kilcullen of the Center for a New American Security.  All were very knowledgeable and experienced, offering their unique perspectives on what should be done to create a stable Afghanistan.

The source of strife in Afghanistan was discussed among the panelists.  All generally agreed that the Taliban is not the only source of instability.  Along with the Taliban, government corruption and a lack of economic development are factors that contribute to the creation of a breeding ground for insurgency.  Due to such a cycle of instability, Dr. Kilcullen emphasized that efforts in Afghanistan should not only focus on counter-insurgency and counter-terrorism, but also on stability efforts.

Because of the many factors contributing to instability, the panelists generally agreed that a solution to conflict in Afghanistan cannot be merely military in nature.  A political solution is needed, one that focuses on empowering civilians and reforming the government.

Security of civilians must be ensured, and the only way to do so is to have a more capable and less corrupt government.  Unless a credible and legitimate government that is capable of ensuring law and order is established in Afghanistan, the Taliban will keep resurfacing.

Basic rights and access to economic resources are also crucial to achieving stability, as Zainab Salbi stressed.  She argued that if Afghans, especially women, have access to jobs and education, they would not pay heed to the Taliban.  In addition, she argued that Afghans also desire an end to human rights abuses, as well as access to justice.  The reason the Taliban has leverage is because it offers the people financial support and protection, in exchange for patronage.  When another source of support emerges, the people will no longer have to rely on the Taliban.

However, such stability efforts are long-term goals, and may take 12-15 years.  As the U.S. is seeking to withdraw troops in July of 2011, a more immediate solution is desired.  Amb. Crocker discussed the idea of negotiating, from a position of strength, with all interested parties.  He commented on the international dimension of the instability in Afghanistan and the need to engage other countries that have an interest in the stability of Afghanistan, such as Pakistan.  He believes the partnership with Pakistan needs to continue for the sake of security efforts.

And with Afghanistan becoming more nebulous and the insurgency continuing, members of the committee voiced their concerns about U.S. involvement in the issue.  A worried Chairman Senator Kerry asked the panel why Afghans, if they do not like the Taliban, could not fight the Taliban themselves.  The bottom-line answer from the panelists was that in order to quell the Taliban, Afghans need support to become powerful enough to counter the Taliban.  While the Afghans may not like the Taliban, they prefer anyone who can offer them stability.


1 Comment »

  1. Wars are so easy to start but so difficult to end, or just to escape. I think about all the lives, American, Afghani and Iraqi that have been lost and all the money spent while, in Washington, the president and his sage advisors hold meetings to decide on policy. Would this move look bad on the world stage? Would that move be better? What will country A do if we do this or that? Grand schemes are debated against the oh-so-terrible thought of cut and run! Our prestige! Our reputation!

    In years past, I was hopeful that a lesson had been learned with the Vietnam fiasco. But it only takes time to bring in a new set of arrogant wielders of great power and new driving ideas like “American Exceptionalism” that are really the old hubris in new clothing.

    The grunts who volunteer to die for their country are dispatched and sacrificed while the high and mighty eventually leave office and retire to comfortable homes (note the plural). The young who died get grave markers and the elderly living who had the big ideas get such things as another in a long series of heart operations to keep them going.

    The worst thing about great power is the itch to use it. Then come the years of writhing about how to withdraw after the foolishness is clear. A bunch of maniacs fly planes into buildings and all hell breaks loose for two countries that couldn’t be more remote, more alien to Americans, in particular to the big chief who strutted around barking “you are with us or against us?” and “bring it on!”. So we revenge ourselves by ravaging countries as unknown to us in language, culture and politics as could possibly be in the name of that infinitely flexible and reliable term – national security.

    Half of the periods of our latest wars have been finessing the exit so that we think we look good, though the entire world looks on undeceived and aghast.

    With all the celebration in 1989 as the USSR crumbled, I was anxious that the U.S. was being a little too haughty. Never did I think it would come to this. In terms of wasted lives, resources, and goodwill the first 10 years of the new century for the United States have been an epic disaster. But let’s not be too quick to withdraw!

    Comment by Clif Brown — July 27, 2010 @ 8:01 pm | Reply

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: