Fair Policy, Fair Discussion

January 28, 2010

Ramallah rally for Palestinian prisoners

Filed under: Palestinian politics,West Bank — Katya Reed @ 2:54 pm

~ From Katya Reed in Ramallah

Yesterday as I was walking home from Ramallah’s big produce market, I watched huge crowds pour into Manara Square waving Palestinian flags and placards with pictures of Palestinian prisoners.

AFP estimated that 500 people turned out for that rally, which was held to demand that the release of Palestinian prisoners be part of any peace deal with Israel.  Rallies were held throughout the West Bank on January 27,  which is newly recognized by PM Fayyad’s cabinet as the official day for solidarity with Palestinian political prisoners.  Many held signs of Marwan Barghouti and other prominent prisoners, while others held framed photos of imprisoned members of their family.

AFP reports on their interview at the rally with one of the organizers:

“This demonstration is part of a series of events organised to further the prisoners issue in any future political negotiations,” Palestinian prisoner affairs minister Issa Qaraqaa told AFP.

“The prisoners issue must be a main issue on the agenda of any negotiations.”

There are currently some 7,500 Palestinians held in Israeli jails, including 34 women and 310 minors, according to the Palestinian Authority.”

(more…)

December 17, 2009

Olmert’s “Palestinian state” plan– and the US role

Filed under: Israeli settlements,Washington's diplomacy,West Bank — Helena Cobban @ 10:15 am

Aluf Benn has a good scoop in today’s Haaretz: Many details of the “plan” that Olmert claims he presented to Mahmoud Abbas in September 2008, along with a map (PDF here) of the borders he proposed for the Palestinian state.

Benn writes,

Olmert’s office said in response to the disclosure of the plan: “On September 16, 2008, [Olmert] presented Palestinian Authority President Abu Mazen [Mahmoud Abbas] a map that had been prepared based upon dozens of conversations that the two held… after the Annapolis summit… Giving Abu Mazen the map was conditioned upon signing a comprehensive and final agreement with the Palestinians so it would not be used as an ‘opening position’ in future negotiations the Palestinians sought to conduct. Ultimately, when Abu Mazen did not give his consent to a final and complete agreement, the map was not given to him.”

A glance at the map shows that it would leave many large Israeli settlements in place in the West Bank, while the (designated for Israel) roads linking the settlements in the north of the West Bank would lace their way in an extremely disruptive way between the Palestinian towns and villages of that area, which is the most fertile and heavily populated portion of the West Bank.

Also of key importance: Olmert was proposing that Israel hang onto the entire area within the present municipal boundaries of occupied East Jerusalem, and also annex a further huge chunk extending east to Maale Adumim.

One can immediately understand why Abu Mazen was not prepared to see this as a politically sustainable “final” boundary line between the two states.

(more…)

November 28, 2009

Is Alex Trebek putting U.S. interests in ‘Jeopardy!’?

Filed under: Discourse in America,Jerusalem,West Bank — Carlton Cobb @ 11:35 am

As a fan of all things trivial, I make an effort to tune into the nightly TV game show “Jeopardy!” This week, I was intrigued to see that one of the Double Jeopardy categories was “A Journey Through Israel” (scroll down to “Double Jeopardy” and see the last column on the right). Alex Trebek and his Clue Crew entourage frequently generate video clues — remember that the questions and answers are reversed on “Jeopardy!,” so prompts are called clues and responses are in the form of questions — from famous historical or tourist destinations around the world.

But Israel is not a typical tourist destination. The history is ongoing. Almost any site that the show might visit is suffused with current political meaning — something that the producers obviously recognized, since they had Trebek introduce the category as “reliving history thousands of years old or just a few decades old.” (more…)

November 12, 2009

Fayyad and Abu Amr on the crisis

Yesterday, our group had a 40-minute off-the-record discussion with the very pro-American PA prime minister Salam Fayyad.  We also had a much longer discussion with Ziad Abu Amr, a political independent who was foreign minister in the PA’s short-lived national unity government in 2007– and also a close confidante of President Mahmoud Abbas.

Both were extremely gloomy and expressed a strong sense of how they feel the whole of the PA’s very pro-American leadership now feels deeply betrayed by the Obama administration.

Abu Amr said:

Abu Mazen [Mahmoud Abbas] has been playing completely by the book.  The PA has been killing Palestinians to prove that he is prepared to serve Israel’s security interests. What did he get in return? Only a continuation of setttlements, home demolitions, land expropriations…

If this continues, he will not and should not continue in office.

He noted that Abbas has not yet actually resigned (though we have certainly heard plenty of rumors that that might be under consideration.)

“If Abu Mazen resigns,” he said,

under the Palestinian Basic Law– which I helped to draft back in the 1990s– the speaker of the Palestinian Legislative Council would take over. That is Aziz Dweik. So let th Americans deal with him.

Dweik, who was recently released from an Israeli prison, is the parliamentarian from the Hamas-affiliated Change and Reform Party who was elected speaker of the PLC after the free and fair PA election of January 2006.

Abu Amr also told us,

Abu Mazen feels betrayed and fooled by the Americans… There is no way the Palestinians can do any more than they have done…

If Abu Mazen resigns under circumstances of crisis, then no-one could replace him– or, would want to…

The problem is, the Americans have abandoned the Road Map. What Hillary Clinton said about the Israeli government having made “unprecedented concessions” was against the Road Map, against Annapolis, and against Oslo.

More, later…

November 10, 2009

An Arab ally begins to doubt Obama

Filed under: Israeli settlements,Washington's diplomacy,West Bank — Carlton Cobb @ 11:12 pm

On Sunday our delegation met with Bishr Khasawneh, the chief of staff of the Foreign Ministry in Jordan. It is clear from what he told us that Jordan, a U.S. ally and one of the so-called Arab moderates, is beginning to worry about recent changes in President Barack Obama’s policy towards the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Khasawneh argued that the president had started his first year in office on particularly strong footing. Obama signaled his commitment to resolving the Arab-Israeli conflict by naming George Mitchell as his envoy for Middle East peace within 24 hours of taking office. He also made speeches, in Turkey and Cairo, that emphasized two points that Bush administration policy had ignored: 1) the critical importance of implementing a two-state solution and 2) the regional context of the conflict.

The need for a change in American policy is overdue, he said, after “good faith and confidence have eroded over eight years of stagnation” in the peace process. The Arab side has demonstrated its willingness to make peace with Israel and give it the legitimacy it deserves, by continuing to support the Arab Peace Initiative for the last seven of those years. Even after the Gaza war had such a deep, negative psychological impact on the region, all 22 Arab states and 57 Muslim states kept it on the table at the Doha summit in March. The time is ripe for American leadership.

Khasawneh said that the Obama administration had chosen the right issue, settlements, on which to challenge Israel and move the process forward. Jewish settlements, he said, had made the Palestinian portions of the West Bank into “isolated cantons.” Allowing their continued expansion while pressing for negotiations made no sense. Gesturing to the cup of coffee on the table, he argued that one person cannot negotiate with another over dividing a cup of coffee while one person continues to drink from the cup.

The new Obama position seems to be to push for final status talks despite allowing Israel to continue building settlements. Khasawneh argued that the administration appears ready to include enough loopholes in the proposed settlement “freeze” as to make the agreement meaningless. Israel is fighting with the U.S. over which loopholes should be included, as though the freeze is a negotiable concession to the Palestinians. Instead, Khasawneh argued, Israel should agree to implement a settlement freeze as a way of finally giving a positive response to the Arab Peace Initiative.

The key for Obama is to regain the momentum that he helped generate in the beginning of his first year by continuing to demonstrate his leadership on the settlement issue and breaking with the policies of his predecessor. Khasawneh suggested he can do that by promoting the Arab Peace Initiative as one basis for negotiations and by refusing to allow settlement expansion to continue at the same time that he calls for final status negotiations.

Settlers, settlers, settlers

Filed under: Helena's travels,Israeli settlements,West Bank — Helena Cobban @ 9:24 pm

Our group of CNI “political pilgrims” is in Jerusalem now. Yesterday we drove down to Hebron, where we received a warm welcome from Dr. Nabil Ali Jaabari, Chairman of the Board of Trustees of Hebron University, and many other leading members of the university’s faculty. We had good discussions with them– and also with some of the very articulate English-language and English-lit students at the university. Then, some folks from the university helped organize a trip to downtown Hebron for us.

We wandered through the maze of small, stone-paved streets of the historic center of this important Palestinian city. Many of the stores there were shuttered tight shut in the middle of the day: they have been abandoned by  their owners, on a longer- or shorter-term basis, because of the harassment they’ve faced from the hundreds of Israeli settlers who have moved into the heart of the town. In some streets, only one or two stores were still open, doing a very lack-luster amount of business, while around them tens of stores stood closed, a few with some hate-graffiti on them in Hebrew.

There’s one section of the  souk where the settlers have moved into apartments directly overlooking the market-lanes and for some years now have periodically tossed trash and various other noxious substances down into the market. There, the store-owners long ago rigged up netting above the market-lanes to protect their customers from the trash.  Today, the nets sag down, heavy with garbage items including old clothes, rags, bottles, stones, and so one.

While in Hebron, we went into the two separate portions of the historic old stone worship space, long used as a mosque, but now with a portion of it reserved for Jewish worship.  At the entrances to both sides, there is a very heavy Israeli military presence, with young, machine-gun-toting soldiers presiding over multiple security checks. In the Muslim worship space, you can still see the bullet holes from where the (deranged?) American-Jewish settler Dr. Baruch Goldstein ran amok with his army-issued machine-gun in 1994, killing more than two dozen Muslims who were praying there.

Oh, what a pity that PM Rabin didn’t take advantage of that incident to evacuate all the settlers who had started to move into the heart of downtown Hebron.  Their numbers have grown greatly in the 15 years since then, and their provocations against the city’s Palestinians have continued. And then, of course, it has taken a non-trivial part of the Israeli military to be there to protect them.

As we drove the 25 miles to Hebron and back (along a mainly “settler” road), the speed and extent of the land-grabbing the Israelis have been involved in, in recent years, throughout the southern West Bank were only too obvious. Har Homa is now a massive urban area– and nearly all of it has been built since 2000. Efrata, Kiryat Arba, and various other very large settlements were all too evident from the road.

Those extensive land grabs have clawed great chunks of West Bank land out of the Palestinians’ hands and have led to the dicing up of the Palestinian areas by means of the road networks and wall/barrier systems constructed for the benefit of the settlers.  These circumstances of loss of resources and progressive loss of the possibility of self-governance have led to a dull but deep anger among many of the Palestinians we’ve met so far.  But the activities of the settlers who have thrust their outposts into the heart of heavily populated Palestinian cities seem to me to be the ones that continually threaten to explode the whole situation here.

In that respect, the actions of the two very ideological settler organizations Ateret Cohanim and Elad that are at work in Jerusalem seem particularly dangerous.

This afternoon, we took a tour of many of the southern and eastern parts of the present “Jerusalem” with Sarah Kreimer, deputy director of the Israeli NGO Ir Amim.  She did a great job showing us where the settlers have been building numerous, extremely provocative outposts right inside historically Palestinian neighborhoods over the past ten or so years– in Ras al-Amoud, Silwan, Nof Zion, etc.

In many of the places Sarah took us, you could see the wall/fence system snaking around the hills and valleys.  In some places, as she noted, it divides Jewish Israeli “communities” (i.e., settlements) from Palestinian communities.  But in a large portion of east Jerusalem, it divides Palestinians from Palestinians.

She gave us all copies of this map at the start of the tour, which was really helpful. But Ir Amim has many other helpful maps available at their website, here.

We’ve also had some other really informative experiences and discussions since we got into Jerusalem 48 hours ago. But I am way too tired to write anything more about them.

« Previous Page

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.